Quote:
Originally Posted by AaDi
So whats the point being made here?
Any civil President/Prime Minister after coming to power *has to* go to USA for *holding talks*. So we can say even our previous governing bodies were being governed.
I really don't mind USA controlling the politics in our country as long as it works for us at the end.
I still do not understand whats the problem here? Is it he took over the country using martial law or was it him not letting go of his uniform? or was it the emergency that caused more flare? Your title of the thread and the content really elude the reason..
Ah and one more thing I think you should think about before posting a reply.. Please do have a look at the other side of the coin.
|
Not my piece exactly, as you may already know
. I have been pro-musharraf for most of the time and trust me, by pasting this piece here, I am indeed paying attention to the other side of the coin. Now to answer your question(s): He wasn't a) President in the 1980's b) USA's meddling didn't work for us c) threat to our national security and nuclear weapons - war seems more imminent than ever. The following two pieces shed further light:
[Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
^ It's dangerous, even if it's scaremongering or propaganda.