Desi Forums - View Single Post - Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2005, 04:33 AM
Endurer's Avatar
Endurer Endurer is offline
Impresario
Location: Hong Kong
Gender:
Visit Endurer's Blog
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 24
Posts: 11,077
Credits: 190,225
Endurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond reputeEndurer has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Skype™ to Endurer
Re: Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?




These shots of John Young and James Irwin - like many Apollo photos - show a lunar sky without stars (J). Yet with no atmosphere on the moon, stars should be visible - a fact confirmed by Maria Blyzinsky, Curator of Astronomy at the Greenwich Observatory, London. If NASA could not hope to recreate the lunar sky, they may have opted for simple black backdrops. NASA claim that the sunlight was so strong it overpowered the light from the stars. On the shadow side of the landing modules, there are plaques (K) with the American flag and the words 'United States' quite bright and clearly visible, but the gold foil around the plaques is in near darkness. Studio spotlights highlighting these areas, or technicians retouching the prints, could have caused this effect.


NASA claims the strange shape (E) - in this shot taken from the Lunar Module while it was 95 km above the moon's surface - is a shadow cast by the Command Module's rocket. But when larger aircraft fly at lower altitudes over the Earth, they do not cast such huge and defined shadows.

Reply With Quote
 
Payday Loans Loans Loans Debt Help Saftey Manuals