Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake?

adams001 · #16 (**permalink**) 12-14-2005, 07:08 AM

yea me too dun agree

surdy · #17 (**permalink**) 12-17-2005, 05:46 PM

:O ... this is amazing
i just googled for this , look what i got
the other side of the story [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...] dunno what to belive

nashid78 · #18 (**permalink**) 12-18-2005, 08:53 PM

they have a quite good point there..............in the days of technology u never know

sachintendulkar · #19 (**permalink**) 12-21-2005, 09:36 PM

Is this true?? Atlease the snaps prove that it was fake...
could be the snaps are fake

mohitsharma · #20 (**permalink**) 12-26-2005, 04:13 AM

no sorry, dont think so

jr064 · #21 (**permalink**) 12-26-2005, 04:11 PM

this debate about the fake landing will never be resolved. Both sides of the story seem credible.

_Adonis_ · #22 (**permalink**) 12-26-2005, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunil73 @ November 9th 2005, 4:18 am

There are every type to literature available in this time, but it is up to you what you think best for you. There are documentaries about gay marriages, free sex life, liberation in sex relation. My question is , Will all that documentaries are correct?

To start up with... There's a difference in reports, documentaries and literature. No wonder they are the somehow related, but they are not as similar as you expect them to be.

The documentaries are not always true, as there's no such condition to assert for them to bring out the mere truth in documentaries. Documentries are heavely dependant on the perceiver's mind, as they are generally made by using a neutral approach to the subject, but having a biased opinion deep down.

The issues concerning gays and homosexuals are not related to this topic, so I'd rather prefer not to talk about them here.

Quote:

Endurer, your profile show that you are some kind of marketing Director, well i believe on your profile. So please, be represent yourself as you claim you are.
I am very sorry if i offend you. Actually from the last 6 years i am living here in europe (basically i am from karachi), i have seen lot of rubbish literature as i mentioned above. So be logical and try to find the truth.

Blah ...

Quote:

Thousands of rubbish documentaries been made on Islam and other religion, Is that all true? Please read and forward the literature which is authentic.

Again, I'd strictly stick to the topic as to assert that the authentency of an article cannot be turned down by considering some bad examples.

Use google, and browse a little bit concerning these things, you will get to know about the hoaxes of Apollo Mission.

Quote:

Be perfect like you are using username, Perfectionist. It looks you are living here in europe so use correct information and means to be logical.

As for being logical, the language, the way of writing, way of presentation and expression matters more than the material presented. So ....

_Adonis_ · #23 (**permalink**) 12-26-2005, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunil73 @ November 9th 2005, 1:21 am

If USA fake landing on moon then they should be in big trouble.

Let's see, Soviet Union that time also supper power and big time enemy.
And Russian are first send man in the earth's orbit.

If USA plot fake moon landing, why not Russians speaks about this? they could say that American are faking this? They have sufficient knowledge of Space and astronomy. Do think about this, Please be rational.

The peace treaty, my friend ...

The world is on a cobweb dude, the great spider will swallow everyone someday after using us.

_Adonis_ · #24 (**permalink**) 12-26-2005, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perfectionist @ November 9th 2005, 1:24 am

Nice post! i've seen all the decomentry report! it was very interesting!

Man, yet didn't reach to MOON!

Well, its quite an eccentric case, as though, Apollo landing was not the only moon landing. We hope that the other landings wont be hoaxes

Endurer · #25 (**permalink**) 12-27-2005, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunil73 @ Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:18 am

There are every type to literature available in this time, but it is up to you what you think best for you. There are documentaries about gay marriages, free sex life, liberation in sex relation. My question is , Will all that documentaries are correct?

and the question is?

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunil73 @ Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:18 am

Endurer, your profile show that you are some kind of marketing Director, well i believe on your profile. So please, be represent yourself as you claim you are. I am very sorry if i offend you. Actually from the last 6 years i am living here in europe (basically i am from karachi), i have seen lot of rubbish literature as i mentioned above. So be logical and try to find the truth.

what is logic or how do you (at your best) explain the scope of being 'logical? what has living-in-europe-from-bla-bla-years got to do with logic?

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunil73 @ Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:18 am

Thousands of rubbish documentaries been made on Islam and other religion, Is that all true? Please read and forward the literature which is authentic.

refer to the post made by _Adonis_, enlightenment guaranteed!

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunil73 @ Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:18 am

Be perfect like you are using username, Perfectionist. It looks you are living here in europe so use correct information and means to be logical.

contradiction en masse. wait we have europe(?) to blame

DonWit · #26 (**permalink**) 12-27-2005, 05:37 PM

why discuss

it does not concern us...

when somone from the subcontinent will land on moon then i will debate...

why waste time debatin bout biased n ******
Americans

_Adonis_ · #27 (**permalink**) 12-27-2005, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DonWit @ December 27th 2005, 6:37 pm

why discuss

it does not concern us...

when somone from the subcontinent will land on moon then i will debate...

why waste time debatin bout biased n ******
Americans

It's important ....

The reason is that we need to have the up-to-date knowledge of Astronomy and the people who are currently the forebearers of this business ...

Endurer · #28 (**permalink**) 12-27-2005, 10:49 PM

an article about why they feel like going back to the moon:

Quote:

The recent release of the details of NASA's proposed plans for human return to the moon in response to President Bush's "Vision for Space Exploration" last year has drawn much comment -- some positive, some negative and some simply perplexed.

Although the reasons for undertaking the program were clearly articulated in the president's speech, it is important to reexamine why the moon is its cornerstone and what we hope to achieve by returning there.

The moon is important for three reasons: science, inspiration and resources. All three are directly served by the new lunar return architecture. This program has the potential to make significant contributions to our national economy and welfare.

The moon is a scientific laboratory of extraordinary facility, richness and benefit. The history of our corner of the solar system for the past 4 billion years is preserved and readable in the ancient dust of the lunar surface. This record is lost on the dynamic and ever-changing surface of Earth. Other planets do not record the same events affecting Earth and the moon, including impacts, space particles and the detailed history of our sun. The recovery of this record will let us better understand the impact hazard in the Earth-moon system as well as unravel the processes and evolution of our sun, the major driver of climate and life on Earth.

The moon is a stable platform to observe the universe. Its far side is the only known place in the solar system permanently shielded from Earth's radio noise. That allows observation of the sky at radio wavelengths never before seen. Every time we open a new spectral window on the universe, we find unexpected and astounding phenomena; there is no reason to expect anything different from the opening of new windows on the universe from the surface of the moon.

The moon is close in space (only three days away) yet a separate world filled with mysteries, landscapes and treasures. By embracing the inspiring and difficult task of living and working there, we can learn how to explore a planetary surface and how the combined efforts of both humans and machines can enable new levels of productive exploration.

In 21st-century America, our existence depends on an educated, technically literate workforce, motivated and schooled in complex scientific disciplines. Tackling the challenges of creating a functioning society off-planet will require not only the best technical knowledge we can muster but also the best imaginations. One cannot develop a creative imagination, the renewable resource of a vibrant society, without confronting and surmounting unknowns and challenges on new frontiers.

Although of fairly ordinary composition, the moon contains the resources of material and energy that we need to survive and operate in space. With its resources and proximity to Earth, the moon is a natural logistics and supply base, an offshore island of useful commodities for use there, in space and ultimately back on Earth.

Water is an extremely valuable commodity in space -- in its liquid form, it supports human life, and it can be broken down into its two components, hydrogen and oxygen. These elements make the highest-energy chemical rocket propellant known. Water exists in the dark and cold regions near the poles of the moon. Scientists estimate that each pole contains more than 10 billion tons of water, enough to launch a fully fueled space shuttle once a day, every day, for over 39 years. The ability to make fuel on the moon will allow routine access to Earth-moon space, the zone in which all of our space assets reside.

The moon's slow rotation, unclouded skies and abundant local materials make it possible to build installations specifically designed to harvest solar energy there. Solar power, collected on the moon and beamed to Earth and throughout the space between the two, can provide a clean and reliable energy source not only for space-based applications but ultimately for users on Earth as well. Lunar solar power solves the apparent "showstopper" of other space-based solar power systems -- the high cost of getting the solar arrays into space. Instead of launching arrays from the deep gravity well of Earth, we would use the local soil and make hundreds of tons of solar panels on the moon.

Living on the moon will expand the sphere of human and robotic activity in space beyond low-Earth orbit. To become a multiplanet species, we must master the skills of extracting local resources, build our capability to journey and explore in hostile regions, and create new reservoirs of human culture and experience. That long journey begins on the moon -- the staging ground, supply station and classroom for our voyage into the universe.

The writer is a lunar scientist and staff member at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Last year he served as a member of President Bush's Commission on the Implementation of U.S. Space Exploration Policy.

Code:

source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/26/AR2005122600648.html

recently I've read about 'an explosion on the mood' here goes the news by NASA:

Quote:

[img=right:b46ec846b8]http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/images/lunartaurid/sitemap_new_med.jpg[/img:b46ec846b8] December 23, 2005: NASA scientists have observed an explosion on the moon. The blast, equal in energy to about 70 kg of TNT, occurred near the edge of Mare Imbrium (the Sea of Rains) on Nov. 7, 2005, when a 12-centimeter-wide meteoroid slammed into the ground traveling 27 km/s.

"What a surprise," says Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) researcher Rob Suggs, who recorded the impact's flash. He and colleague Wes Swift were testing a new telescope and video camera they assembled to monitor the moon for meteor strikes. On their first night out, "we caught one," says Suggs.

[img=right:b46ec846b8]http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/images/lunartaurid/impact2_med.jpg[/img:b46ec846b8] Right: An artist's concept of the Nov. 7, 2005, explosion. Credit: NASA/MSFC. "The chance of an astronaut being directly hit by a big meteoroid is miniscule," says Cooke. Although, he allows, the odds are not well known "because we haven't done enough observing to gather the data we need to calculate the odds." Furthermore, while the danger of a direct hit is almost nil for an individual astronaut, it might add up to something appreciable for an entire lunar outpost.

Of greater concern, believes Suggs, is the spray—"the secondary meteoroids produced by the blast." No one knows how far the spray reaches and exactly what form it takes.

Code:

source: http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/22dec_lunartaurid.htm

erendis · #29 (**permalink**) 01-10-2006, 11:35 PM

whaaaat? if america wanted to 'fake' landing on the moon, then they would have beat the russians

sanseh · #30 (**permalink**) 01-15-2006, 09:21 AM

Absolutely not!!!