Musharraf had handlers in Mossad-US Agency since the 80s

It is possible that Musharraf could be under the control of these handlers even now??? It shows that as an Army officer, Pervez Musharraf covered the connection of a lady to a foreign intelligence agency. Normally, one is supposed to tell the authorities. That gives credence to the well founded allegations that he also had, and still has, foreign handlers.

It is possible that Musharraf could be under the control of these handlers even now? If you are aware of WTC-Building 7 controlled demolition on September 11, 2001, then you know there is something fishy – that it was an inside job . Like the other two towers, Building 7 came down in seconds[1] defying gravity (100 metres in 4.5 seconds) which was a controlled demolition[2] and BBC read [3] the demise of the Building 20 minutes before [4] it happened.

However, how does it connect to Musharraf and him being the agent of foreign intelligence agencies long before he even thought that he would be the Commander in Chief? Here are some tips for thoughtful, resourceful and brave researchers to find the truth about the real Musharraf and bring him to justice for treason and betrayal under his own Army Act [5]:

- Question: Why was Musharraf fired in Oct. 1999?

- Tip –1 : Musharraf’s illegal foreign contacts [6] are not so hidden either [7] . Some were revealed, but no one will talk. They became state secrets. See the case of Javed Hashmi [8], for example.

- Tip – 2: In the 80s, there was a Journalist John Doe and his wife Agent Jane Doe, in Rawalpindi.

John Doe was divorcing his wife. It was in court. Musharraf was the representative of the lady Jane Doe in the court. Divorce happened but Mush made sure that John Doe did not open his mouth about the real reason behind the divorce in Public Court.

The real reason behind the journalist John Doe divorcing his wife was that she was an agent of a foreign intelligence agency. As John Doe discovered it, he no longer wanted to continue the marriage. Interestingly, journalist John Doe’s wife was a very close relative of Musharraf.

- Tip – 3: This is authentic story. But to find out about the journalist John Doe and his wife Jane Doe in detail, one has to check the family court record in Rawalpindi. During the divorce proceedings Musharraf was the representative of the lady Jane Doe. It shows that as an Army officer, Pervez Musharraf covered the connection of a lady to a foreign intelligence agency. Normally one is supposed to tell the authorities. That gives credence to the well founded allegations that he also had, and still has, foreign handlers. How is it connected to 9/11? When I was doing my research into the ISI connection to 9/11, I gave General Musharraf a huge benefit of the doubt in the book, From BCCI to ISI: The Saga of Entrapment Continues [9]. However, the deeper one goes, the more he realizes that it is almost impossible

that ISI would be using its human assets [10]; its human assets will be linked to the CIA, M16 and others; the human assets will be meeting Osama and the foreign agencies at the same time; the Chief of the ISI will also be meeting his human assets as well as the high level officials in the US around the same time and also wiring money ($100,000)[11] to the lead "hijacker” in the Operation 9/11.

Gen. Mahmoud Ahmad was never questioned by 911 commission, is a Tableeghi Jamaat member with a long beard now. He maintains a house at Mai de Khoi, Faisalabad and one in Islamabad. He was chairman of a government entity like fertilizer corporation. Musharraf was never asked as to why he said," Daniel Pearl got over intrusive..."[12] Why Omar Sheikh was never produced in an open court? And why Benazir talks of Omar Shiekh as the murderer of Osama with David Frost on November 2,2007?

Musharraf was the Director Military Intelligence when the CIA supported the creation of the Taliban/Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. Brig. Gen. Ejaz Shah [13] was the handler of Omar Sheikh per Benazir. This shows Musharraf was very much part of 911 and cover up (of it being inside job with Dick Cheney at Command. [14]

Musharraf’s connections to foreign intelligence agencies since the early period [15] of his carrier suggests that he is not out of the loop when it comes to operation 9/11. He is one of the main culprits. If any other individual had sent even a dime to Atta, he might have died of waterboarding and other torture techniques by now. However, General Mohamoud is a free main in Pakistan. So despite deep connections to the alleged hijackers to the ISI, nothing happens to the Pakistani Generals or Pakistan as such. To the contrary, remember how former CIA director James Woolsey tried to prove [16] Atta met Iraq security officials, but could not. That was the time when they were looking for justifications for the war of aggression on Iraq.

Eqbal Ahmad in 1998 said [17] that Osama was just the excuse to go into the Oil lands...Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan. And his observation seems true. The warlords needed time. They needed moles at the highest positions, such as the Chief of Pakistan armed forces. Musharraf had to kill the Chief of Air staff Mushaf Ali Mir because he won’t agree with Musharraf’s policy and planning(Mushaf was a patriot). He had to depart. Mushaf died in a plane crash in clear weather in the most safest plane, along with his wife and closest confidants. Controversial author Gerald Posner implies that all of these events are linked together and the deaths are not accidental, but have occurred because of the testimony of captured al-Qaeda leader Abu Zubaida in March 2002 (see Early April 2002). The deaths all occurred not long after the respective governments were told of Zubaida’s confessions. [18] This simply confirms foreign hand in Mushaf’s murder.

Benazir did not agree to Musharraf policies. Note that Musharraf says that she was "very unpopular in the Army". [19] Musharraf thinks he alone is the Army. Benazir would not budge on his uniform issue. She had to go.

Musharraf has violated his Oath five times. It is up to the Patriotic Army men to understand the situation and use the Army Act on Musharraf [20] to protect Pakistan from internal aggression.

Notes:

[1].
[2].
[3].
[4].
[5]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[6]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[7]. URL: [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[8]. URL: [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[9]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[10]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[11]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[12]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[13]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[14]. [a] Crossing the Rubicon: Simplifying the case against Dick Cheney [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
Norman Mineta Confirms That Dick Cheney Ordered Stand Down on 9/11
[b]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
A testimony left out of the 9/11 report.
[15]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[16]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[17]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[18]. URL: [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[19]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]
[20]. [Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]

well endure you are absolitly right, but I do or other person don't forwared any comment here,
Bcoz its a political games...
thanks you...4 shearing...

So whats the point being made here?

Any civil President/Prime Minister after coming to power *has to* go to USA for *holding talks*. So we can say even our previous governing bodies were being governed.

I really don't mind USA controlling the politics in our country as long as it works for us at the end.

I still do not understand whats the problem here? Is it he took over the country using martial law or was it him not letting go of his uniform? or was it the emergency that caused more flare? Your title of the thread and the content really elude the reason..

Ah and one more thing I think you should think about before posting a reply.. Please do have a look at the other side of the coin.

Not my piece exactly, as you may already know . I have been pro-musharraf for most of the time and trust me, by pasting this piece here, I am indeed paying attention to the other side of the coin. Now to answer your question(s): He wasn't a) President in the 1980's b) USA's meddling didn't work for us c) threat to our national security and nuclear weapons - war seems more imminent than ever. The following two pieces shed further light:

[Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]

[Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]

^ It's dangerous, even if it's scaremongering or propaganda.

Its a tricky matter, the previous governments I suppose 'accepted' what was carried about in the country (pointing at Lal Masjid issue), no one can be sure how many places are there in Pakistan where training of weapons is given, youngsters are being trained to 'die in the name of God'. All previous Governments kinda played along with them, they didn't bother them, they didn't bother the country. But the problem started when those very militants started making news:

[Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]

[Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]

[Only Registered and Activated Users Can See Links. Click Here To Register...]

Specially do read the last one. The problem started when Musharraf stopped all this and as a result hell broke loose in Pakistan itself. Personally I think if it wasn't for Musharraf, we would have been invaded by US long ago, its only cuz of his sweet talks and direct approach that we are still a bit away from all that hassle.

And oh coming back to the topic, I really don't think something that happened 20 years ago is going to affect anything. Its the present that counts and I think hes (Musharraf) done enough to prove his worth as the President.

Dear All

These are all forced written statement and a agenda against pakistan, so please i request all of you to use your own mind when passing a statement.

Oh I see how he has proven his worth by sticking to his seat for nearly 10 years. Democratic force? Need of time? I obviously think otherwise.

It wasn't that they didn't touch them just because they didn't hurt Pakistan internally. It's because they were feeding, financing, and training them just so they could rage war elsewhere. The moment that they stopped to is the moment they had to taste their own medicine.

Now to say that Musharraf salvaged Pakistan right out of a presumed US invasion is all rhetoric to me, or scaremongering, for that matter.